Re: [OT?] Which is most future-proof desktop environment?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 11:53:45 -0800
Kyle Terrien <kyleterrien@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It's amazing how the pattern of removing features and changing things
> arbitrarily for the "greater good" is spreading around nowadays.  It
> has invaded Firefox recently.  Mozilla is talking about deprecating
> XUL this year.

Deprecating XUL (and XPCOM) actually has a good and logical reason,
which is making Firefox properly threadable and removing many security
holes that the present architecture has. It's not change for the sake
of change (which I will admit some Firefox changes have been) — it is
change for the sake of keeping up with the modern world.

~Celti

Attachment: pgpbvDpQHAiSd.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux