Re: [OT?] Which is most future-proof desktop environment?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Ralf Mardorf writes:

> IIRC, I won't read the thread again, all the mentioned WMs and DEs have
> a past and most likely a future. You might have noticed another thread,
> "plasma 5 crashing". The bloated DEs, especially GNOME and KDE do not
> provide a steady work-flow. New major releases often are released before

What is a "steady work-flow"?

> they are stable, but again, even if those releases would be stable,
> the way they work changes and breaks the work-flow. I don't know if a

More generally, what do you mean by "work-flow", and how have DEs like
KDE and Gnome broken "the work-flow" in the past?

/M

--
Magnus Therning              OpenPGP: 0x927912051716CE39
email: magnus@xxxxxxxxxxxx   jabber: magnus@xxxxxxxxxxxx
twitter: magthe               http://therning.org/magnus

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety
     -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux