Re: [OT?] Which is most future-proof desktop environment?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Ralf Mardorf writes:

> On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 12:22:46 +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
>>Personally I've not come across anything in new releases of Gnome that
>>has been even close to that irritating.
>
> Dropping the menu bar isn't irritating? Employers need to re-train
> staff, if such a radical change happens, not to mention that there even
> could be the need to buy new hardware, because the graphics could be to
> slow, when 3D capability is required. It's not only expensive, but
> also polluting. I don't know another DE that made such evil changes as
> GNOME does, IMO it's the most worse DE of all DEs.

Nope, it wasn't irritating *to me*.  I can fully understand that others
found it irritating, I'm just saying that I didn't.

/M

--
Magnus Therning              OpenPGP: 0x927912051716CE39
email: magnus@xxxxxxxxxxxx   jabber: magnus@xxxxxxxxxxxx
twitter: magthe               http://therning.org/magnus

Hofstadter's Law: It always takes longer than you expect, even when you
take into account Hofstadter's Law.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux