Re: [OT?] Which is most future-proof desktop environment?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 06:47:49 -0700, Leonid 'Beef Marsala' Isaev wrote:
>If it is something that uses system resources efficiently and
>alows you to disable unnecessary bloat, then we agree. But this also
>implies that you'd like to use graphics card to render windows, not
>CPU.

I like that the graphics driver works with a rt patched kernel and that
I don't get xruns at high DSP load and low latency, when doing real-time
audio work, while the GUIs still must remain responsive and fast. It
doesn't matter in which way this is provided, it only matters that it
proves itself in practice.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux