Re: [OT?] Which is most future-proof desktop environment?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 09:06:57PM -0500, D C wrote:
> XFCE, is that really future-? It looks dated as heck, not bashing it or
> anything, just saying. If Gnome Shell wasn't my long term desktop I would
> prob use XFCE. Gnome shell only comes alive tho if your machine isn't slow
> as Fu*%

Depends on how you define "future-proof." Personally, I'm glad XFCE
hasn't gone the way of Gnome, so I see it as future-proof in the sense
that it's not likely to go "tablet crazy" like so many other things
have. So while you may call it dated, I call it relieving. Change for
the sake of change is never a good idea in my book.

--Sean


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux