[OT?] Which is most future-proof desktop environment?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OT?] Which is most future-proof desktop environment?
From: Francis Gerund <ranrund@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 18:43:09 -0500

Just a call for opinions:  if you use Arch, and you wanted to choose and
stay with a desktop environment long-term, what would you choose - and why?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OT?] Which is most future-proof desktop environment?
  - From: Magnus Therning
- Re: [OT?] Which is most future-proof desktop environment?
  - From: Gener Badenas
- Re: [OT?] Which is most future-proof desktop environment?
  - From: D C
- Re: [OT?] Which is most future-proof desktop environment?
  - From: Serge Hooge
- Re: [OT?] Which is most future-proof desktop environment?
  - From: Marshall Neill
- Re: [OT?] Which is most future-proof desktop environment?
  - From: Ivan

Prev by Date: Re: Performance with Linux Bridge
Next by Date: Re: [OT?] Which is most future-proof desktop environment?
Previous by thread: Performance with Linux Bridge
Next by thread: Re: [OT?] Which is most future-proof desktop environment?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux