Re: Why irrelevant updates?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Could it be it was installed during installation. I have found reiser, btrfs and journal file programs of which I only use ext4.


On 05/12/2015 05:45 PM, Francis Gerund wrote:
Sometimes pacman presents updates that just don't seem to apply to my
system.

Just one example: sudo pacman -Syyuv presents btrfs-progs, even though:

1)  I do not, and have not, used the Btrfs file system with my Arch setup.

2)  It is "Required by: None"

3)  It is "Optional for: None"

But I hate to reject it. After all, there must be some reason it was
presented . . .  right?

So, if I just say "yes" to all upgrades, won't my system over time get
weighed down by excess stuff, until it grinds to a halt?

Or, if I just make my best guess at what is really need and reject the
rest, won't I have a Frankenstein system that will eventually break?

And why, why, why doesn't it just present upgrades appropriate for my
system?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux