Re: core/linux provides kernel*26*, not kernel4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



2015-05-03 18:29 GMT+02:00 Doug Newgard <scimmia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> The only purpose they would serve would be someone running extremely out of
> date packages or trying to upgrade an extremely out of date system.


I don't think a system running a 2.6 kernel would be salvageable anyway.
The many filesystem, systemd, etc upgrades would make this a horrible job.
;)

2015-05-03 18:29 GMT+02:00 Doug Newgard <scimmia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Of course, they also don't hurt anything.


That's also true, but we like to Keep It Simple, right. ;) (although this
might be a bit overly obsessive)

Sebastiaan


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux