Re: gpg source validation for kernel.org style signatures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 10:16:10AM +0100, Christian Hesse wrote:
> I do not think we need HTTPS, though it does not hurt. If anybody tries to
> fool us with man-in-the-middle via HTTP we should detect that just fine with
> broken signatures (given signatures are provided...).
> 
> Appending .sign may help as well. In fact for an example file archive.tar.xz
> we may want to check for {${FILE},${FILE%.(xz|bz2|gz)}}.{asc,sig,sign}
> 
> $ export FILE=archive.tar.xz
> $ echo {${FILE},${FILE%.(xz|bz2|gz)}}.{asc,sig,sign}
> archive.tar.xz.asc
> archive.tar.xz.sig
> archive.tar.xz.sign
> archive.tar.asc
> archive.tar.sig
> archive.tar.sign

Does makepkg(8) know how to check sigs of .tar files as opposed to .tar.xz?

Cheers,
-- 
Leonid Isaev
GPG fingerprints: DA92 034D B4A8 EC51 7EA6  20DF 9291 EE8A 043C B8C4
                  C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE  775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D

Attachment: pgpv22ruExrkO.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux