On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Doug Newgard <scimmia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yeah, it's not like sed options are defined by POSIX or anything... > > Your entire problem here seems to be that you don't like the > development style of pacman. In that case, get involved instead of just > whining about it after the fact. It's been well known that this has > been coming for over 9 months. > > And for the record, I have see problem making relatively minor changes > like this with a minor release. If you think it's a problem, you're > going to need a better argument that "it's common sense". What you see > as common sense, I see as arbitrary and artificial restrictions for no > good reason. I myself would dearly love to know what precisely about removing a discouraged option qualifies as a major change. -- Eli Schwartz
