On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 08:28:46 +0200 Sebastiaan Lokhorst <sebastiaanlokhorst@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2014-10-14 8:13 GMT+02:00 Hugo Osvaldo Barrera <hugo@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > > There would be little point in getting it to work with Chromium > > anyway. Why would you care if you're using an open source browser > > if you're gonna add a propietary DRM plugin onto it? > > Just pick Chrome and avoid the hastle. That is, after all, what > > Chrome is: Chromium + propietary addons (+ some rebranding). > > > > A proprietary plugin can be sandboxed, to be sure it doesn't do > anything it's not supposed to do. That's at least the idea that the > Firefox people want to implement. > > Besides that, just using Chrome is indeed the easiest solution right > now. The only problem is that it is not in the official Arch > repositories, leading to more hassle. > > Would it be possible to move it there from the AUR? We have lots of > closed-source software in the official repositories, and I think > Chrome (with EME and Flash Player built in!) would be very useful for > people. We already have the old NPAPI Flash Player, so I don't see > why this would be a problem. > > Sebastiaan I believe the closed source portions are non-redistributable.
