-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/27/2014 09:30 AM, Benjamin A. Shelton wrote: > On 09/27/2014 01:28 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> On Sat, 2014-09-27 at 01:21 -0600, Benjamin A. Shelton wrote: >>> I assumed NoExtract should have been enough >> Correct! Or are we missing something? > > Oddly, using only NoExtract caused pacman to remove the usr/bin/sh > symlink, replacing it with nothing. (Using both NoUpgrade and > NoExtract seems to work fine.) > > Perhaps it's a local oddity on my installation, but I admit I > didn't fiddle with it for more than 5 minutes. I very likely > overlooked something. > > ...when all you have is a hammer... > > Benjamin Same here. With only NoExtract, I linked /bin/sh to dash, reinstalled bash, and /bin/sh was gone. With both NoExtract and NoUpgrade, I did the same and /bin/sh was still a link to dash. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUJm8gAAoJEMqreLELZNG3bKYP/0LrVW6alK/Z6uj0L9DRoas9 8f+PQd44XM54DQfWRhVDOlPaqvmnb5ki43IPkOPrar4tSaWGsyjletpaS/8sc8bd w/UYjaXJHZ7lkUx4Zn8jJVFAdOrCxJQgilKJoabrhppT9auTppk17KdnoYvTMzEc O8EUIwxkcUsF4wC5HLg2UG4jW1QJq3QRxRxkJrxslko2mH7cJVnqrPuYGxadjDMI vHL9/PWWmrIg1eB2hlgzEWly19NOjhFrWs7snpcCfztmgX8P790xKtrBy55Cwqkb skXAWYM93t+cC/vgrKwvL0pzCLxcen9DfwCeghYkawUtTXf8ZfLLLegMQBMaUP64 He/5NOmhg6iU7C1BOuJ8G+7fzxJbSf4wCQLPqE6eEmpUoiqBqSDWqPPSK55Myq3Q 7mFpuivxx0PJr3mrY66Ty7JpRAsuah4RC6hNOxmzCvZhpNRdFAdrN7ZzMEVulO1D k3sJ/SzH6qTfqn4M2+lO6bmLugv4G6ft0Y7/opAOkK4T0m6AnNboxuzic57N91Wc 1PWPJLTTu5s5BJiEvUPWmOyxGbKp8sSVqBXlJLonTI0oGuIGWdM3xORZOowWa9Ag zPobnTGxhsQs8vEBlG46Q4JwNZGAfwN4fVewcEaIcLNzEDpqp7XwLuzwC7yrPYRA wpKflV6bobJKGQqjLMSw =C31o -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
