-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/27/2014 09:01 AM, Benjamin A. Shelton wrote: > On 09/26/2014 05:11 PM, Doug Newgard wrote: >> >> I should qualify that in that I don't think adding another >> package to base is a good idea *unless* there is a significant >> benefit to doing so. The plan to add dash to base when Arch was >> using initscripts made sense, it doesn't now that we're using >> systemd. There's already too much in base IMO. >> >> Doug > > By that reasoning, if the intent is to make base leaner, then bash > ought to be replaced with dash (mkinitcpio and others > notwithstanding). :) > > Benjamin Regardless of what's the default, could there be a cleaner way to use dash as one's /bin/sh without preventing pacman from upgrading bash? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUJmGBAAoJEMqreLELZNG38YIQAMBQ8UZRDxh7ilZebOTNNyPr D2okKntq/9/lgdf64aZSSjvtaZUtKKatq/3PEs5KKF15zs4R8ESoE4W9o3eEaZGa DpCoekgmr+h0eybQxfBjC1RX9xAXxmJ1pBF0kv5CrmGK6cd6maHdI7QCLLpHBJ3O YU5gq6j5kX3pYNdIayLUoRWMZlphr1OfD3u1myzLTQWArAmQo+mFDYUbZdCpfAmd AEmuuOTeiBQBqiPdPEgq4K7OlV+5gYtUehOYrr9PnTZqiR7PI7ntE0c4RnDf15pJ 6dTkQXAwQDUl9wStmBwMdyt1Sa88qaD9A5FRXR8U7eJg6glHaxQlfuf/KZt/dlDC jTuaw2rVh84FXRC3zZHa0NE/mG7Xb+AoQN8SZGGvU3IlWspXUb+zO98ReuhVycQT jqlFij7kI7H+2BKDsZqH8aZca9CnyOC7ZyEBhxfh8sZiPKTgCIsKYYbECgVMVynz S0bR9LJuO/QmR1Y2m/I5oUYlZoUYeRBjcb04BuwEgHTUEYyIrtjjtZ+NLsRDV+oo pLC5C3G1cadr4liasvlaWcPTjQiy1DJBkUqEziF6rnFjPQZHC/Hvz3P+LC65cg40 kT3gDd4pAgR8QJetSuuLwTN0bLLso5x5kxMrHk0J0fdqEAQt+AYn4vmX9UO/LGeW 7V7bdDlBA2TdbuENvbEA =nLLX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
