On 09/05/14 01:01 AM, Mark Lee wrote: > > To all, > > Don't make any of this personal. In addition, I hope the inclusion of > systemd in Arch Linux has more justification than just some Arch > developers are also Systemd developers. Arch may not be a democracy, but > it's not supposed to be infested with cronyism either (I don't think it > is). Let's all be calm and collected here and sort things out. > > Regards, > Mark I never stated that it was a reason for it being included in Arch Linux. You're misrepresenting what I said. The context of the thread is someone promoting content including a lot of inaccurate claims and ad hominem attacks like this: "systemd's team is noticeably chauvinistic and anti-Unix" and yet making this claim: > This is not a rant against Arch or its devs and community, but against > systemd; the sad facts speak for themselves. I was countering the claim by pointing out that the group of people they are disparaging includes several Arch developers and other prominent people in the community.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
