On 14/03/14 03:10 AM, GSC wrote: > On 03/14/2014 02:35 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: >> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/39070 ? > Thanks for the info. That' s the reason. Do we have any policy regarding > updating package to an officially unstable version to provide bug fixes? > What the severity should that bug be to make such an update? If the projects don't actually plan on doing more point releases for the stable release, then it's not really a stable release at all. For example, LLVM releases *zero* fixes for a 'stable' release at the moment.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
