I agree, arnaud. The thing is, netctl is an Arch specific that exists since before networkd was even a plan, IIRC. I don't know what will happen in the end, but I'm always inclined to prefer an upstream solution, so my guess is Arch will do the same. 2014-03-05 18:27 GMT-03:00 arnaud gaboury <arnaud.gaboury@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Mario Rugiero <mrugiero@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Daniel is right. netctl and systemd-networkd are two different things. > > > > > Yes, for sure. Let's take a bet : netctl will one day be "obsoleted", > no upstream, and replaced entirely by networl@.service and networkd. > Want to bet ? These two services are at some point doing the same things. >
