É quase como se as coisas de cada planeta se fortificassem a toa. Cada decisão errada deles costa sangue. Estaremos acostumados. Enviado do meu dispositivo de rastreamento Em 01/01/2014 01:56, "Mark Lee" <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > On Tue, 2013-12-31 at 22:33 -0500, arch-general-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote: > > On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 19:39:03 +0100 > > Thomas B?chler <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Really? Who? > > > > Hmm, me. Intel atom here... > > > > > You are suggesting not changing to a sane default because some > > packages > > > (especially in the AUR) have crappy maintainers. That's hardly a > > reason > > > for anything. > > > > A sane default would probably be $(nproc)-1. But in general, is it a > > good > > idea to have calls to binaries in a config file? So far, makepkg.conf > > doesn't > > have anything like this. > > > > Happy new year, > > Leonid. > > > Salutations, > > What if there is one core? What would be the output of make -j0? > > If makepkg.conf is to avoid binary calls, where else could this be > placed? Would it be added directly to /usr/bin/makepkg as a flag that > can be toggled in makepkg.conf? > > Regards, > Mark > > -- > Mark Lee <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >
