On Tue, 2013-12-31 at 22:33 -0500, arch-general-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 19:39:03 +0100 > Thomas B?chler <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Really? Who? > > Hmm, me. Intel atom here... > > > You are suggesting not changing to a sane default because some > packages > > (especially in the AUR) have crappy maintainers. That's hardly a > reason > > for anything. > > A sane default would probably be $(nproc)-1. But in general, is it a > good > idea to have calls to binaries in a config file? So far, makepkg.conf > doesn't > have anything like this. > > Happy new year, > Leonid. > Salutations, What if there is one core? What would be the output of make -j0? If makepkg.conf is to avoid binary calls, where else could this be placed? Would it be added directly to /usr/bin/makepkg as a flag that can be toggled in makepkg.conf? Regards, Mark -- Mark Lee <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
