Re: qemu vs. qemu-kvm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



I'm using qemu-kvm 1.2 and it works (for me) much better than qemu.
Under standard qemu I was unable to install windows xp guest
(bluescreen during installation), and on other guests disk and network
with virtio was unbelievable slow. I'm testing it right now with linux
mint livecd; under qemu-kvm it booted in less than 3 minutes to login
screen, under qemu (with -enable-kvm) it took more than 6 minutes.
With `lsof /dev/kvm` I can see that both qemu-kvm and qemu were using
acceleration.

I have no experience with qemu 1.3.

-- 
Krzysztof Warzecha


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux