[2012-11-15 11:35:06 +0000] Leonidas Spyropoulos: > On 15 Nov 2012 10:15, "Gaetan Bisson" <bisson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > [2012-11-15 09:23:43 +0000] Leonidas Spyropoulos: > > > And written permission should be the emails, thus I believe we are fine. > > > > Written permission should be a legally binding document. An email > > stating the personal opinion of somebody who is neither a lawyer nor > > official representative of the copyright holder (the company) has no > > legal value. > > > > Of course nobody cares; people just want to throw more and more binary > > blobs in [community] because it's cool and the AUR is for losers... > > Fair enough I can understand that, so having it in the AUR instead will > save us from all that discussion since it's not binary, it's just a link > for fetching and unzipping it, right? Roughly yes: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository Use the AUR - you will love it. I don't know when people started thinking the AUR wasn't good enough for their packages anymore... -- Gaetan
