On 15 Nov 2012 10:15, "Gaetan Bisson" <bisson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [2012-11-15 09:23:43 +0000] Leonidas Spyropoulos: > > And written permission should be the emails, thus I believe we are fine. > > Written permission should be a legally binding document. An email > stating the personal opinion of somebody who is neither a lawyer nor > official representative of the copyright holder (the company) has no > legal value. > > Of course nobody cares; people just want to throw more and more binary > blobs in [community] because it's cool and the AUR is for losers... Fair enough I can understand that, so having it in the AUR instead will save us from all that discussion since it's not binary, it's just a link for fetching and unzipping it, right? > > -- > Gaetan
