On 28 Sep 2012 11:34, "Tom Gundersen" <teg@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > An option could be to enable moderation on dev-public, still defaulting to > rejecting everything, but allow through high-quality contributions from the > outside. > I concur this idea, but who's is going to moderate it? You should consider that also if someone from the devs moderate it (more work for them). > I agree that we should create a venue for would-be contributors to engage > with us, but i also agree that we don't want to end up with non > constructive content in dev-public, and we don't want to waste time on > justifying rejecting/banning things (it should stay high-quality and low > volume as we expect all devs and all users of testing to read it > thoroughly). > +1 for a "bridge" to the dev-land. > I don't know the best solution, just throwing out an idea. > > Tom
