> > "We", is me and the people that don't like the systemd+udev beast, and > > they are a lot. > > Huh? I've never seen any complaints about udev before you. Mind you, > udev is around since 2003. Actually it's completely different to back in 2003 because of huge amounts of complaints. Check lwn.net > It was merged into systemd's source, but > it's not a problem to use it without running systemd. Otherwise your > system won't run, don't you think? Udev provides /dev after all... > Wikipedia says you can use something else, but libudev itself is in > use. Where's the link, does it mean for dynamic /dev otherwise that's completely wrong and libudev != udev/systemd. -- _______________________________________________________________________ 'Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work together. Write programs to handle text streams, because that is a universal interface' (Doug McIlroy) _______________________________________________________________________
