Perhaps you're on the wrong distribution, Mr. Contreras. Based on the wikipages on ArchLinux' philosophy, it's all about being simple, but bleeding-edge, ahead-of-the-curve. According to one of the posts I've come across, Systemd seems to be what other less-aggressive distributions are using. Also, Arch has expressed clearly that it doesn't plan on being user-friendly. Besides being explicitly stated in the wiki, it is quite strongly implied at installation, with its lack of a user interface. If you want something stable, you could probably go with Debian. I recall reading that it isn't shifting to Systemd, and that its EXTREMELY stable.
