On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Brandon Watkins <bwat47@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> A big switch like this will have problems regardless of when you do it. Its >> best to do it soon and get the teething issues over with. For most people >> systemd seems to work fine and is production ready (also evidenced by the >> fact that some other major distros have already made the switch some time >> ago). > > It is best to do it sooner? Why? In order to maximize the breakage? You see, that's the attitude that really enfuriates me. Why post in such a provocative tone? He gave his arguments, you didn't reply. You just bitch cause you don't want to spend the time to fix your problems. I sent you some hints to debug systemd boot process and you ignored it. And now I will send you another one (see, I'm in a pacifist mood today): https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_debug_Systemd_problems I've found it in the bottom of the Arch wiki page for systemd. So, it's not hard to find information on how to solve problems. And remember, Arch is not about holding hands of any user. We should be competent enough to deal with our own problems. If you have to ask for help, you should be competent at it too, asking politely, doing your part, etc. -- A: Because it obfuscates the reading. Q: Why is top posting so bad? For more information, please read: http://idallen.com/topposting.html ------------------------------------------- Denis A. Altoe Falqueto Linux user #524555 -------------------------------------------
