Am 16.08.2012 16:57, schrieb Heiko Baums: > Am Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:22:58 +0200 > schrieb Thomas Bächler <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> So you're saying that instead of fixing the problem, every user should >> remove the offending posts. >> >> The problem here are a small handful of people who start flames and >> spread FUD. Banning a handful of people from the list is an easier >> solution IMO. I am generally against such measures, but it seems we >> will have no choice. > > And how do you decide whom to ban? Just because his opinion differs > from yours? No personal offend. But there are or have been quite a lot > of people here - I would even say, most of the people who are currently > screaming the loudest - who are calling other people troll, while being > trolls themselves, and shout for banning those people just because > those people have different opinions and they can't bear other opinions. I am not planning to start banning people, at least I don't want to. I am simply stating that it is an option that will be considered and that client-side filtering is not an acceptable solution. I am hoping that the threat of being banned will make people shut up for a day and calm down, then continue discussing normally and calmly. > And I think > everybody has a right to say his opinion, even if he doesn't have a > detailed, technical "proof" of his opinion. This is a technical mailing list. If you want to discuss technical topics about Arch, you're in the right place. If you want to state your _opinion_, get yourself a blog.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
