On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Fons Adriaensen <fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 04:12:58AM +0800, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: > > > On 16 August 2012 03:46, Fons Adriaensen <fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:25:05AM +0800, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: > > > >> It is a new 'upstream' that we can rely on for running our GNU/Linux > > >> systems. It so happens that this time it's a core part of the system > > >> that's being 'standardised'. If you're not a fan of freedesktop.org, > > >> then I'm afraid that's a religious position you choose to take. > > > > > > That is completely upside down. Blindly accepting truth 'fom above'. > > > in this case freedesktop.org, is a religious attitude. Refusing > > > to do that certainly is not. > > > > Sorry, I do not recall anyone blindly accepting any kind of truth. > > See above: "It is a new 'upstream' that we can rely on". > > s/upstream/god/ > > Haven't seen anything as close to blind faith as that recently. > > Ciao, > > -- > FA > > A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. > It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris > and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) > > No one said they are blindly accepting anything upstream does without any thought, you should stop putting words in people's mouths and making ridiculous accusation of 'religious fundamentalism'.
