Am Mittwoch, den 25.07.2012, 20:42 +0100 schrieb Leonidas Spyropoulos: > Maybe it's just my idea but I think the system is somewhat faster on > the booting now. > > Just my opinion but as I see initscripts are abandoned and Archlinux > is a bleeding edge distro, it's natural solution to adopt systemd. > +1 from me :) > > Disclaimer: this was done on a laptop a very recent installation, > maybe on other more complicated installations it's harder. +1 I've "converted" two Arch installations from initscripts to systemd. After some fiddling about my nfs-mounts systemd works fine, and I didn't get any problem with it so far. I hardly understand people who only read about systemd and complain all the time. Is it just the fear of new things? Maybe systemd will make things easier for arch-newbies, because they have not to care about the order of the DAEMONS in rc.conf (networkmanager after dbus etc.). And I hardly believe that people are using Arch only because of "simplicity" of one single config file. regards bjo -- xmpp: bjo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx bjo.nord-west.org | nord-west.org | freifunk-ol.de
