Op vrijdag 8 juni 2012 23:29:49 schreef u: > Op vrijdag 8 juni 2012 15:32:19 schreef Dan McGee: > > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Tobias Powalowski > > > > <tobias.powalowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > signoffs are done, anything that stops us from moving to new kernel > > > series? > > > > Do we just blindly follow the signoffs page, or do we actually notice > > people having trouble? It seemed quite obvious to me this should not > > move: > > http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-June/023072.ht > > ml > > > > -Dan > > since i cant post to arch-dev-public i'll do it here. > > there are some serious issues with 3.4+ with nfsv4, the issues should be > taken care of in 3.4.2 > > maybe you could bring in a 'testing' kernel being 3.4.2-rc1 > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.4.2-rc1.gz > patch this on top of your 3.4.1 tree and test ? > > people having issues with nfsv4 could already see if it would be solved with > a possible 3.4.2 patch and then when 3.4.2 becomes 'official' just do a > short retest if there are no regressions from rc to official. > > after a really 'small' test i don't seem to have any problems with nfsv4 > with 3.4.2-rc1 > > --Ike another thought, you could even drop the rc kernel in staging and notify the people with issues they can test from there --Ike
