Op vrijdag 8 juni 2012 15:32:19 schreef Dan McGee: > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Tobias Powalowski > > <tobias.powalowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi guys, > > signoffs are done, anything that stops us from moving to new kernel > > series? > > Do we just blindly follow the signoffs page, or do we actually notice > people having trouble? It seemed quite obvious to me this should not > move: > http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-June/023072.html > > -Dan since i cant post to arch-dev-public i'll do it here. there are some serious issues with 3.4+ with nfsv4, the issues should be taken care of in 3.4.2 maybe you could bring in a 'testing' kernel being 3.4.2-rc1 kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.4.2-rc1.gz patch this on top of your 3.4.1 tree and test ? people having issues with nfsv4 could already see if it would be solved with a possible 3.4.2 patch and then when 3.4.2 becomes 'official' just do a short retest if there are no regressions from rc to official. after a really 'small' test i don't seem to have any problems with nfsv4 with 3.4.2-rc1 --Ike
