Christian Hesse <list@xxxxxxxx> on Tue, 2012/05/08 10:35:
> Any thoughts on that?
Ok, some notes from myself...
There were two reasons why I did not use lxdm:
* I thought it did not work with challenge response authentication via pam.
Obviously this is not true: You can enter the password only only, but it is
tested for every pam prompt. So I can enter unix password or oath token -
both work.
The only "problem" is that it does not show the pam message ("One-time
password (OATH) for ..." - but I can live with that.
* I had trouble interactively selecting a session from lxdm. It took me some
time to find the cause: The greeter did not give session type to lxdm when
no language selection dropdown was shown.
I fixed that (see https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/29814), now everything
works fine.
Additionally it seems to fix a problem with mouse cursor...
So for now I will stick with lxdm I think. Thus I am fine with not having
lightdm in the official repos.
--
main(a,b){char*/* Schoene Gruesse */c="B?IJj;M"
"EHCX:;";for(a/* Chris get my mail address: */=0;b=c[a++];)
putchar(b-1/(/* gcc -o sig sig.c && ./sig */b/42*2-3)*42);}
