On Wed, 9 May 2012 13:57:14 +0200 Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > The way used to handle conditions is wrong. And I admit that for /this/ > particular case, this is not much relevant. > I actually prefer the first case with multiple ifs. It helps newbie techs dive in and read the code. So what if they break it they will learn fixing it. > > There's another point, shell is easily editable and understandable and > > that's a good thing and not a bad one and also one of arches values I > > believe, hence pacman uses so much shell! > > I don't find pacman much editable, sorry. I've given examples of nice > features not easy to implement, here in the past. ,-p There are a lot of functions and files to get a handle on aren't there. Is that the reason? I don't think that detracts from the point though?
