On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Alexandre Ferrando <alferpal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 25 January 2012 09:41, Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Alexandre Ferrando <alferpal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 25 January 2012 09:25, Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> :: Starting full system upgrade... >>>> warning: lib32-libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than multilib (1.7-3) >>>> warning: libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than extra (1.7-2) >>>> warning: xcb-proto: local (1.7-1) is newer than extra (1.6-2) >>>> >>>> I thought it'd just be an outdated mirror or something, but a check on >>>> archlinux.org searching for xcb shows that the latter versions are >>>> current in the repos. Did something travel backward in time? >>> >>> Outdated mirror. This was something that got solved in Saturday. >> >> Why would the website show otherwise? >> >> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=libxcb >> >> It shows 1.7-3 for lib32-libxcb and 1.7-2 for libxcb here for me. >> Doubt my browser checks for /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist (hopefully). > > Because libxcb 1.8 was dropped. See [1] > > [1] http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-January/022433.html Thanks, missed that. Sorry for the noise.
