Re: lib32-xcb, libxcb, and xcb-proto newer than in repos?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Alexandre Ferrando <alferpal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 25 January 2012 09:25, Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> :: Starting full system upgrade...
>> warning: lib32-libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than multilib (1.7-3)
>> warning: libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than extra (1.7-2)
>> warning: xcb-proto: local (1.7-1) is newer than extra (1.6-2)
>>
>> I thought it'd just be an outdated mirror or something, but a check on
>> archlinux.org searching for xcb shows that the latter versions are
>> current in the repos. Did something travel backward in time?
>
> Outdated mirror. This was something that got solved in Saturday.

Why would the website show otherwise?

http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=libxcb

It shows 1.7-3 for lib32-libxcb and 1.7-2 for libxcb here for me.
Doubt my browser checks for /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist (hopefully).


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux