Re: pacman new generation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense, Tue 2011-11-22 @ 13:43:58-0200:
> Code language should not be chosen based on popularity. C is used in
> most unix-like software because of its quality and not as a
> consequence of the available developer pool for it.

Maybe not, but the person I was replying to was making the specific
argument that higher-level languages like Haskell would be more suitable
for a tool like pacman because a larger number of people would be able
to contribute. I was simply pointing out the fact that that is certainly
not the case for Haskell in particular.

I don't think popularity is irrelevant, either, assuming you are
interested in increasing the volume of contributions to your project. If
you pick a relatively obscure language to work in, you are just creating
another barrier that makes it harder for new people to become acquainted
with the codebase.

Attachment: pgpNkxcEOHspi.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux