Re: pacman new generation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



The 22/11/11, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Nicolas Sebrecht <nsebrecht@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > OP raised one or two benefits of Haskell over shell scripting. He is
> > right even if it's somewhat partial: many of high-level languages have
> > very good advantages over shell scripting. I do think pacman could be
> > much better if rewritten in one of these languages.
> 
> Isn't pacman written in C?

Yep, sorry. 

  s/shell scripting/low-level progrmming languages like C/g

:-)

-- 
Nicolas Sebrecht


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux