Re: pacman new generation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 22 November 2011 11:20, Magnus Therning <magnus@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So my conclusion is that when you say "I do think pacman could much
> better if rewritten in one of these languages", then I say that you
> most likely are completely wrong.  The more likely effect of rewriting
> pacman in one of these languages is that the current development team
> would disperse, there wouldn't be as large a pool of programmers to
> recruit from to replace them, and in the end pacman would turn out to
> be worse.

Spot on. I agree 100% with this, well said.

Clive
-- 
Infinity: A concept for those who cannot comprehend the big picture.

() Arch Linux - For movers and shakers. ()


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux