On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Tom Gundersen <teg@xxxxxxx> wrote: <snip> > Maybe this requirement should be communicated more clearly (e.g. a > comment in the standard pacman.conf)? Great idea. I mean, as a non-[testing] user I get that guinea pig feeling which comes naturally with linux often enough. Don't miss to express that [testing] here is far from what other distros label with "testing" and will hopefully break your system (because we want to know). <snip> > [0]: a lot of the non-trivial bugs against my packages are discovered > after they move to core, probably because the people with the right > hardware/use-cases are not using testing. Looks really like I keep missing all the fun. What the hell, I'll add [testing] to my pacman.conf tonight... cheers! mar77i
