On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:41 AM, Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > A user basically is using [testing] without fulfilling the above > requirements. Should the user be advised not to use [testing] or is > this counter-productive to the purpose of [testing]? It is very important that people use testing [0], so we should really encourage _more_ rather than less of that, IMHO. Rather than advice the user to stop using testing, I'd advice them to sign up to the mailinglist :-) Maybe this requirement should be communicated more clearly (e.g. a comment in the standard pacman.conf)? Cheers, Tom [0]: a lot of the non-trivial bugs against my packages are discovered after they move to core, probably because the people with the right hardware/use-cases are not using testing.
