On Aug 2, 2011 6:39 PM, "C Anthony Risinger" <anthony@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Tobias Powalowski > <tobias.powalowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi guys, > > please signoff 3.0 series for both arches. > > > > Upstream > > changes: > > http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges > > > > Archlinux Changes: > > - Rename the package kernel26 -> linux > > - Added replaces everywhere > > - Removed old comments and vercmps from .install file > > - Removed old comments and replaces from PKGBUILD > > - added compatibility symlinks for vmlinuz26 and initramfs filenames > > in PKGBUILD, in order to not break bootloader entries. > > - removed System.map file, not needed anymore we provide > > /proc/kallsyms > > > > Now stuff to discuss before uploading to testing: > > - kernel name: vmlinuz-linux > > - initramfs name: initramfs-linux.img > > same for fallback of course. > > both look good here -- x86_64 + i686 > > ------------------------------ > > ... out of curiosity, if the original reason for having a `kernel26` > package was to also have a `kernel24` (from what i read -- wasn't > around then) how is this handled with the `linux` package? or is this > a non-issue? > > C Anthony I think that nobody has kernel24 in their system, so this isn't an issue. -- Kwpolska Sent from my phone.
