dmbuce@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > On 06/26/2011 04:53 PM, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote: >> What does "route" say in this case? I had a similar problem with >> the update which was due to the gateway being ignored. At that point >> I switched to netcfg which worked fine... >> >> Jerome > > Looks fine to me. Same output as I get on my laptop. > > # route -n > Kernel IP routing table > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use > Iface > 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 > eth0 > 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 > eth0 > Not the same issue then, I did not have the first line... Switching to netcfg might still be an option however. Jerome -- mailto:jeberger@xxxxxxx http://jeberger.free.fr Jabber: jeberger@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
