dmbuce@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > Trying dhcp with the old syntax fails, and configuring a static ip > appears to succeed, but then fails when I try to do something with the > connection. > > eth0="eth0 192.168.0.116 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.0.255" > INTERFACES=(eth0) > gateway="default gw 192.168.0.1" > ROUTES=(gateway) > What does "route" say in this case? I had a similar problem with the update which was due to the gateway being ignored. At that point I switched to netcfg which worked fine... Jerome -- mailto:jeberger@xxxxxxx http://jeberger.free.fr Jabber: jeberger@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
