Am 25.05.2011 18:21, schrieb Yaro Kasear: > On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 11:14:55 Sander Jansen wrote: >> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Thomas Bächler <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >>> Am 25.05.2011 17:43, schrieb jesse jaara: >>>> This is from recent kerbel mailing list post. A voice inside Torvals >>>> head is telling hin that it would be time to go for 3.0 versioning >>> >>> Everyone, don't get too excited. The reasons for "Linux 3.0" are >>> - "the numbers are getting too big" (2.6.40) >>> - the 2.6 prefix has no meaning, and 3.0 for a release and 3.0.1 for a >>> bugfix release is shorter than 2.6.40 anf 2.6.40.1 >> >> Of course, the 3. would still have no meaning.... :P >> >> Sander > > I heard from several reliable sources it'll be 2.8, not 3.0. I doubt that. After Linus discoverted that "2.8.0" is longer than "3.0", and thus the -stable releases could use the third digit instead of the fourth, he was pretty fond of the "3.0" idea.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
