Re: Future of 'kernel26'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Thomas Bächler <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am 25.05.2011 17:43, schrieb jesse jaara:
>> This is from recent kerbel mailing list post. A voice inside Torvals head is
>> telling hin that it would be time to go for 3.0 versioning
>
> Everyone, don't get too excited. The reasons for "Linux 3.0" are
> - "the numbers are getting too big" (2.6.40)
> - the 2.6 prefix has no meaning, and 3.0 for a release and 3.0.1 for a
> bugfix release is shorter than 2.6.40 anf 2.6.40.1

Of course, the 3. would still have no meaning.... :P

Sander


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux