On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <grbzks@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > JM <fijam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I have browsed through all High and Medium severity bugreports and >> categorized some of them here: >> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Fijam . >> >> 'Candidates for closing' are divided into two categories: strong and >> weak. Strong candidates have not been replied to in over 4 months >> (with some bugs seeing no activity for over a year) with the last >> comment asking for more information or confirmation whether the bug >> still persists. I have not yet started issuing closure requests but >> will do so in two weeks if noone replies to those reports. Weak >> candidates have not been replied to in less than four months, the >> resolution of the bug was unclear or the original submitter found >> another solution and failed to provide any more information. I will >> wait for another month before issuing closure requests. Note: jelle >> van der waa (jelly) asked for confirmation on many of those bugs and >> deserves all the praise. >> >> I have also identified some bugs where more input or a confirmation of >> a fix is needed and asked for it. Will try to do initial triaging on >> those bugs or mark them as candidates for closing if the submitter >> fails to respond. >> >> There was also a couple of bug reports that seemed to be going >> nowhere. There was either a failure in communication, unresolved >> argument, a patch with no feedback from the developers or a request to >> split a bug into two or more specific reports. These should probably >> be reviewed again. >> >> There are still Low and Very Low severity bugs to go through, so >> perhaps some other user wants to pick up where I left :) > > Thanks for doing this. You could have used the already set up > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Bug_Day_TODO page though instead of > your user page. > That might need a bit of cleaning up but if you're willing to transfer > properly the ones on your page there i will help with this if you lack > the time to invest doing the clean up yourself. > > ---- > Greg > I have seen this page but it is a bit of a mess. I will clean it up and merge both lists during the weekend, possibly adding a category 'candidates for removal' based on my own criteria if that's OK. JM
