JM <fijam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I have browsed through all High and Medium severity bugreports and > categorized some of them here: > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Fijam . > > 'Candidates for closing' are divided into two categories: strong and > weak. Strong candidates have not been replied to in over 4 months > (with some bugs seeing no activity for over a year) with the last > comment asking for more information or confirmation whether the bug > still persists. I have not yet started issuing closure requests but > will do so in two weeks if noone replies to those reports. Weak > candidates have not been replied to in less than four months, the > resolution of the bug was unclear or the original submitter found > another solution and failed to provide any more information. I will > wait for another month before issuing closure requests. Note: jelle > van der waa (jelly) asked for confirmation on many of those bugs and > deserves all the praise. > > I have also identified some bugs where more input or a confirmation of > a fix is needed and asked for it. Will try to do initial triaging on > those bugs or mark them as candidates for closing if the submitter > fails to respond. > > There was also a couple of bug reports that seemed to be going > nowhere. There was either a failure in communication, unresolved > argument, a patch with no feedback from the developers or a request to > split a bug into two or more specific reports. These should probably > be reviewed again. > > There are still Low and Very Low severity bugs to go through, so > perhaps some other user wants to pick up where I left :) Thanks for doing this. You could have used the already set up https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Bug_Day_TODO page though instead of your user page. That might need a bit of cleaning up but if you're willing to transfer properly the ones on your page there i will help with this if you lack the time to invest doing the clean up yourself. ---- Greg
