2011/3/9 Thomas Dziedzic <gostrc@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> For such a transition, I think it will be helpful for everybody using >> arch-linux to name aall libri-openoffice packages >> libri-openoffice-supported and all oracle-openoffice packages >> oracle-openoffice-unsupported. Debian at any rate has a playground area >> where unsupported packages go within its repositories as well. That might >> get the message across to even windows users. Certainly if I do a new >> installation of arch-linux I'd want libri-openoffice-supported on my >> system as opposed to anything else.On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 22:00 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote: >>> > just an fyi, >>> > openoffice itself is *huge* and now that it is going to be dropped to >>> > the aur, it will most likely lose all audience because of how long it >>> > takes to compile from source. + libreoffice is just a better version >>> > of openoffice imo, so there should really be no one that uses it. >>> >>> People who want openoffice will probably just use the -bin packages? >>> >>> >> >> >> > > I think naming the libreoffice packages libre-openoffice packages is > just misleading. People should learn the new name. > +1 LibreOffice is perfect,and the old openoffice name should be mentioned in the package description.
