On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > For such a transition, I think it will be helpful for everybody using > arch-linux to name aall libri-openoffice packages > libri-openoffice-supported and all oracle-openoffice packages > oracle-openoffice-unsupported. Debian at any rate has a playground area > where unsupported packages go within its repositories as well. That might > get the message across to even windows users. Certainly if I do a new > installation of arch-linux I'd want libri-openoffice-supported on my > system as opposed to anything else.On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > >> On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 22:00 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote: >> > just an fyi, >> > openoffice itself is *huge* and now that it is going to be dropped to >> > the aur, it will most likely lose all audience because of how long it >> > takes to compile from source. + libreoffice is just a better version >> > of openoffice imo, so there should really be no one that uses it. >> >> People who want openoffice will probably just use the -bin packages? >> >> > > > I think naming the libreoffice packages libre-openoffice packages is just misleading. People should learn the new name.
