qemu-kvm vs. qemu upstream

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Allan McRae <allan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> If this is virtualbox specific, I'd try qemu-kvm.

hey,

i was just trying to get a concrete answer about this the other day,
so maybe you can clarify because i keep reading conflicting and/or
outdated information.

AFAICS, qemu-kvm is still _different_ from upstream kvm support in
qemu, correct?  i tried rebuilding qemu several times, ensuring i had
all the options i wanted (SPICE/kvm/etc) and i was getting absolutely
<expletive deleted> performance -- switch to qemu-kvm and she's
blazing again, yet many places seem to suggest they are one and the
same.

i see they definitely have different sources, but would you/anyone
care to elaborate on the relationship?

C Anthony


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux