Re: ArchBang and other derivates resemblance to Arch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 11:07 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> On 02/07/2011 10:51 AM, Olivier Keun wrote:
> >
> > What are your thoughts about this? I'm hoping to get an official reaction
> > from our dev-team, so we can avoid some of the confusion that is present
> > now.
> >
> 
> there is nothing wrong with this distro and others distros that have 
> arch as a base.
> 
> Is good that the users are interested in this spins and that are 
> discussions about them on our forum.

Would this mean modifications need to be made on our forum policy (as
cited by Olivier?). 

Personally I see ArchBang as similar enough to Arch that most
help/problem-solving is probably pretty identical. Its not the same as
Chakra was, after all. But clear policy helps.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux